In a significant political development, Kenya’s National Assembly has voted to impeach Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. This marks one of the most pivotal moments in the country’s political landscape, as a sitting deputy president faces impeachment in a heated parliamentary session. The vote, held on a Tuesday evening, saw 281 Members of Parliament (MPs) favoring the motion to impeach, while 44 MPs voted against it. Additionally, one MP chose to abstain from the vote.
The impeachment process was initiated through a Special Motion introduced by Mwengi Mutuse, the Member of Parliament for Kibwezi West. The motion laid out a comprehensive list of 11 charges against Deputy President Gachagua, accusing him of various violations, including undermining constitutional principles and engaging in unethical conduct. These allegations have sparked a nationwide conversation, drawing attention to the political tensions within the country.
The Charges Against Gachagua
The motion introduced by MP Mwengi Mutuse contained a range of accusations that were central to the impeachment proceedings. Among the key charges were:
- Gross Violation of the Constitution: One of the primary allegations against Gachagua was that he had violated Kenya’s Constitution, an accusation that is considered highly serious for someone holding the second-highest office in the land.
- Undermining the President and the Cabinet: Gachagua was accused of undermining the authority of President William Ruto and members of the Cabinet, a charge that suggests there were significant internal conflicts within the government.
- Undermining Devolution: The Deputy President was also charged with interfering with the process of devolution, which is a critical pillar of Kenya’s governance structure. Devolution is designed to give more autonomy and decision-making power to local counties, and any attempt to hinder this process is seen as a direct attack on democratic principles.
- Compromising Judicial Independence: Another notable charge was that Gachagua had publicly attacked a judge, thereby threatening the independence of the judiciary. Judicial independence is a cornerstone of any democratic society, and any actions that compromise it are seen as a serious breach of constitutional principles.
In addition to these core charges, the motion further accused Gachagua of:
- Inciting Public Tensions: It was alleged that the Deputy President made statements that could be considered inciteful and inflammatory, further stoking tensions among the public.
- Committing Economic Crimes: Gachagua was accused of engaging in activities that amounted to economic crimes, though the specifics of these allegations were not fully detailed during the parliamentary debate.
- Spreading False and Divisive Remarks: The motion also outlined accusations that Gachagua had been spreading false and malicious information, which had the potential to divide the nation and create unrest.
- Insubordination of the President: A particularly damaging accusation was that Gachagua had publicly shown disrespect and insubordination towards President Ruto, which was framed as a severe breach of protocol and an indication of internal power struggles within the government.
- Bullying State and Public Officers: Finally, the motion claimed that the Deputy President had consistently bullied state and public officers, adding to the list of unethical behaviors attributed to him.
Gachagua’s Defense
Before the historic vote took place, Deputy President Gachagua was given an opportunity to defend himself before the National Assembly. During a two-hour session, he vehemently denied all the charges leveled against him, dismissing them as “outrageous and baseless propaganda.” Gachagua argued that the accusations were politically motivated and intended to tarnish his reputation in order to justify his removal from office.
In his defense, Gachagua stated that the impeachment proceedings were the “most shameful act” ever to take place in the history of Kenya’s National Assembly. He criticized the MPs backing the motion, accusing them of attempting to oust a democratically elected leader on the basis of falsehoods and fabrications. The Deputy President insisted that the charges had no merit and were part of a broader campaign to destabilize his position in government.
What Next?
With the National Assembly having passed the motion to impeach Gachagua, the next stage of the process is for the motion to be taken up by the Senate. The Senate will now review the charges and consider whether or not to uphold the decision made by the National Assembly. This is a critical step in the impeachment process, as the Senate’s approval is necessary for the Deputy President to be formally removed from office.
FOLLOW OUR WHATSAPP CHANNEL FOR MORE UPDATES
For the impeachment to succeed in the Senate, the motion will require the support of at least two-thirds of the Senate members, excluding those who are nominated rather than elected. This means that the outcome will largely depend on the political alliances within the Senate, as well as any possible negotiations that may take place behind the scenes.
The Political Landscape and Broader Implications
The move to impeach Deputy President Gachagua has sparked widespread debate in Kenya, with both political observers and the general public weighing in on the issue. The impeachment process comes at a time of heightened political tension in the country, and many see it as a reflection of deep-seated divisions within the ruling government.
One of the key questions being asked is whether the impeachment is rooted in legitimate concerns over Gachagua’s conduct, or if it is part of a broader political maneuver aimed at weakening certain factions within the government. Some political analysts have suggested that the charges may have been amplified as part of an internal power struggle between Gachagua and President William Ruto, whose relationship has been the subject of intense scrutiny in recent months.
The charges of undermining devolution and compromising judicial independence are particularly significant, as they strike at the heart of Kenya’s democratic institutions. If proven, these allegations could have long-lasting consequences for the country’s political system, potentially leading to reforms aimed at safeguarding constitutional principles.
Public Reaction
Public opinion on the impeachment is divided. Supporters of the motion argue that the charges against Gachagua are serious enough to warrant his removal from office, especially given the accusations of constitutional violations and economic crimes. On the other hand, Gachagua’s allies and supporters have dismissed the impeachment as a politically motivated witch hunt designed to discredit the Deputy President.
In the days leading up to the vote, several protests were held both in support of and against the impeachment, reflecting the polarized nature of the debate. The outcome of the Senate’s deliberations is expected to further fuel these divisions, regardless of the final decision.
The National Assembly’s vote to impeach Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua marks a crucial turning point in Kenya’s political landscape. The charges brought against him, ranging from constitutional violations to inciting public unrest, have raised serious concerns about governance and political accountability in the country. As the motion moves to the Senate for further consideration, all eyes will be on the next phase of this historic process and its potential impact on the future of Kenya’s leadership.
FOLLOW OUR WHATSAPP CHANNEL FOR MORE UPDATES
SHARE THIS POST